In functions, use return
instead of break
.
Problematic code:
foo() {
if [[ -z $1 ]]
then
break
fi
echo "Hello $1"
}
Correct code:
foo() {
if [[ -z $1 ]]
then
return 1
fi
echo "Hello $1"
}
Rationale:
break
or continue
are used to abort or continue a loop, and are not the right way to exit a function. Use return
instead.
Exceptions:
The break
or continue
may be intended for a loop that calls the function:
# Rarely valid
foo() { break; echo $?; }
while true; do foo; done
This is undefined behavior in POSIX sh. Different shells do different things.
When the function is called from a loop:
ksh
keeps going and$?
is 0.bash
version 4.4+ prints an error "break: only meaningful in a `for', `while', or `until' loop", the function keeps going, and$?
is 0.bash
versions before 4.4, will return from the function, break the loop calling the function, or exit a subshell if there's one in between.dash
, BusyBoxash
: like above.
When the function is not called from a loop:
- All
bash
versions print an error "break: only meaningful in a `for', `while', or `until' loop", the function keeps going, and$?
is 0. ksh
,dash
andash
silently keep going and$?
is 0.
Due to the many different implementations, many of which are not helpful, it's recommended to use proper flow control. A typical solution is making sure the function return
s success/failure, and calling myfunction || break
in the loop.
-
Installation
-
Usage
-
Integrating and extending
Each individual ShellCheck warning has its own wiki page like SC1000. Use GitHub Wiki's "Pages" feature above to find a specific one, or see Checks.