Check exit code directly with e.g. if mycmd;
, not indirectly with $?
.
Problematic code:
make mytarget
if [ $? -ne 0 ]
then
echo "Build failed"
fi
Correct code:
if ! make mytarget
then
echo "Build failed"
fi
For the Solaris 10 Bourne shell:
if make mytarget
then
:
else
echo "Build failed"
fi
Rationale:
Running a command and then checking its exit status $?
against 0 is redundant.
Instead of just checking the exit code of a command, it checks the exit code of a command (e.g. [
) that checks the exit code of a command.
Apart from the redundancy, there are other reasons to avoid this pattern:
- Since the command and its status test are decoupled, inserting an innocent command like
echo "make finished"
aftermake
will cause theif
statement to silently start comparingecho
's status instead. - Scripts that run or are called with
set -e
akaerrexit
will exit immediately if the command fails, even though they're followed by a clause that handles failure. - The value of
$?
is overwritten by[
/[[
, so you can't get the original value in the relevant then/else block (e.g.if mycmd; then echo "Success"; else echo "Failed with $?"; fi
).
To check that a command returns success, use if mycommand; then ...
.
To check that a command returns failure, use if ! mycommand; then ...
. Notice that !
will overwrite $?
value.
To additionally capture output with command substitution: if ! output=$(mycommand); then ...
This also applies to while
/until
loops.
The default Solaris 10 Bourne shell does not support negating exit statuses with !
, so ! mycommand
tries to invoke a utility named "!" instead. To test for failure, use if mycommand; then :; else ...; fi
and until mycommand; do ...; done
.
Exceptions:
None.