proxmark3/client/scripts/lf_bulk_program.lua

--
-- lf_bulk_program.lua - A tool to clone a large number of tags at once.
-- Updated 2017-04-18
--
-- The getopt-functionality is loaded from pm3/client/lualibs/getopt.lua
-- Have a look there for further details
getopt = require('getopt')
bit32 = require('bit32')

usage = [[ script run lf_bulk_program.lua -f facility -b base_id_num -c count

 e.g:
   script run lf_bulk_program.lua -f 1 -b 1000 -c 10
]]
author = "Brian Redbeard"
desc =[[
Perform bulk enrollment of 26 bit H10301 style RFID Tags
For more info, check the comments in the code
]]

--[[Implement a function to simply visualize the bitstream in a text format
--This is especially helpful for troubleshooting bitwise math issues]]--
function toBits(num,bits)
    -- returns a table of bits, most significant first.
    bits = bits or math.max(1, select(2, math.frexp(num)))
    local t = {} -- will contain the bits
    for b = bits, 1, -1 do
        t[b] = math.fmod(num, 2)
        num = math.floor((num - t[b]) / 2)
    end
    return table.concat(t)
end

--[[Likely, I'm an idiot, but I couldn't find any parity functions in Lua
  This can also be done with a combination of bitwise operations (in fact,
  is the canonically "correct" way to do it, but my brain doesn't just
  default to this and so counting some ones is good enough for me]]--
local function evenparity(s)
	local _, count = string.gsub(s, "1", "")

	local p = count % 2
	if (p == 0) then
		return(false)
	else
		return(true)
	end
end


local function isempty(s)
	return s == nil or s == ''
end

--[[The Proxmark3 "clone" functions expect the data to be in hex format so
  take the card id number and facility ID as arguments and construct the
  hex.  This should be easy enough to extend to non 26bit formats]]--
local function cardHex(i,f)
	fac = bit32.lshift(f,16)
	id = bit32.bor(i, fac)
	stream=toBits(id,24)

	--As the function defaults to even parity and returns a boolean,
	--perform a 'not' function to get odd parity
  	high = evenparity(string.sub(stream,1,12)) and 1 or 0
  	low =  not evenparity(string.sub(stream,13)) and 1 or 0

	bits = bit32.bor(bit32.lshift(id,1), low)
	bits = bit32.bor(bits, bit32.lshift(high,25))

	--Since the lua library bit32 is (obviously) 32 bits and we need to
	--encode 36 bits to properly do a 26 bit tag with the preamble we need
	--to create a higher order and lower order component which we will
	--then assemble in the return.  The math above defines the proper
	--encoding as per HID/Weigand/etc.  These bit flips are due to the
	--format length check on bit 38 (cmdlfhid.c:64) and
	--bit 31 (cmdlfhid.c:66).
	preamble = bit32.bor(0, bit32.lshift(1,5))
	bits = bit32.bor(bits, bit32.lshift(1,26))

	return ("%04x%08x"):format(preamble,bits)

end

local function main(args)

	--I really wish a better getopt function would be brought in supporting
	--long arguments, but it seems this library was chosen for BSD style
	--compatibility
	for o, a in getopt.getopt(args, 'f:b:c:h') do
		if o == 'f' then
			if isempty(a) then
				print("You did not supply a facility code, using 0")
				facility = 0
			else
				facility = a
			end
		elseif o == 'b' then
			if isempty(a) then
				print("You must supply the flag -b (base id)")
				return
			else
				baseid = a
			end
		elseif o == 'c' then
			if isempty(a) then
				print("You must supply the flag -c (count)")
				return
			else
				count = a
			end
		elseif o == 'h' then
			print(desc)
			print(usage)
			return
		end
	end

	--Due to my earlier complaints about how this specific getopt library
	--works, specifying ":" does not enforce supplying a value, thus we
	--need to do these checks all over again.

	if isempty(baseid) then
		print("You must supply the flag -b (base id)")
		print(usage)
		return
	end

	if isempty(count) then
		print("You must supply the flag -c (count)")
		print(usage)
		return
	end

	--If the facility ID is non specified, ensure we code it as zero
	if isempty(facility) then
		print("Using 0 for the facility code as -f was not supplied")
		facility = 0
	end

	--The next baseid + count function presents a logic/UX conflict
	--where users specifying -c 1 (count = 1) would try to program two
	--tags.  This makes it so that -c 0 & -c 1 both code one tag, and all
	--other values encode the expected amount.
	if tonumber(count) > 0 then count = count -1 end

	endid = baseid + count

	for cardnum = baseid,endid do
		local card = cardHex(cardnum, facility)
		print("Press enter to program card "..cardnum..":"..facility.." (hex: "..card..")")
		--This would be better with "press any key", but we'll take
		--what we can get.
		io.read()
		core.console( ('lf hid clone %s'):format(card) )
	end
end


main(args)